(gradient).webp)
See examiner behavior clearly, and choose the right move faster
See examiner behavior clearly, and choose the right move faster
Every office action forces a decision. Interview, RCE, appeal—or pivot. Without examiner-level clarity, you waste time and rack up cost.
Juristat Analytics puts hard numbers behind every move. View allowance rate, average OAs to allowance, pendency, interview and appeal tendencies, and even quarter-end “end-loading” behavior, per examiner. Build rules your team can follow and act with confidence.
Examiner Analytics turns scattered signals into a clear strategy lens. You see the reality behind each examiner—allowance rate, actions to allowance, pendency, and how they respond to interviews, RCEs, and appeals—framed against art-unit and tech-center context so you’re not misled by raw averages.
Behavioral tells become actionable: interview receptivity, appeal tendencies, even quarter-end “end-loading” that shifts timing. With that picture, you can choose the lowest-cost path for this matter and codify it as policy.
Alerts keep the playbook enforced across the docket—flagging excessive OAs, missed interview windows, or low-allowance risk—while exportable briefs align leadership and outside counsel in minutes. The result is consistent, defensible decisions that move cases faster and cut spend.
Know The Examiner. Win The Decision.
Get data-backed recommendations for when to appeal, request a pre-brief conference, or pursue amendments/RCEs.
Anticipate examiner trends to craft strategies with precision and confidence.
See allowance rate, average OAs to allowance, and pendency trends to forecast effort and set expectations—before you commit.
Identify examiners who respond to interviews, and those who don’t. In our research, most examiners are more likely to allow when interviews are used.
Analyze with confidence using Juristat Analytics’ industry-leading database, drawn from 10M+ pending, abandoned, and granted applications.
One click to share tables with leadership or outside counsel for quarterly reviews and planning.
"I appreciate Juristat's customer service. The chat feature is always touted, and I can certainly see why."
“Three new applications cover the cost of Juristat. I have received more than that since using Juristat."
“Using Juristat, metrics that come from an established third-party, to help manage expectations can be crucial.”
Be more than just a patent attorney to your clients. Become a valuable business partner.
Use examiner analytics to pick the right tactic, faster
Allowance rate, average OAs to allowance, pendency, interview/RCE/appeal outcomes, and timing patterns such as end-loading.
Juristat Analytics is continuously updated and built on 10M+ applications across statuses.
Yes. Create alerts and if-then rules tied to examiner metrics; share the playbook and enforce with notifications.
Yes. Export visuals and tables to brief stakeholders on expected timelines and likely outcomes.
No. Juristat Analytics complements your legal tech stack. Use it for analytics, alerts, and decision support.
Are interviews a crucial tool on the path to allowance, or a time-consuming last resort? Leveraging Juristat Analytics, we'll settle this debate with data-backed evidence in this hour-long webinar.
