(gradient).webp)
Model spend, pick the cheapest winning path, and standardize decisions across your docket
Model spend, pick the cheapest winning path, and standardize decisions across your docket
Prosecution spend creeps up in small, repeatable ways—unnecessary RCEs, missed interviews, slow appeals, and continuations without a business case. Portfolio-wide, those patterns become real money.
Juristat Analytics turns those drivers into forecasts you can act on. See expected office actions, pendency, and cost by examiner and technology area. Compare the ROI of interviews, appeals, Track One, continuations, or strategic abandonment, before you commit. Enforce your playbook with alerts when matters exceed your thresholds.
Juristat models each matter against examiner, art-unit, and tech-center history to forecast office actions, pendency, and dollar impact. Then you scenario-test the real choices—interviews vs. RCEs vs. appeals, Track One vs. standard, and continuations vs. strategic abandonments—to see which path wins fastest for the lowest cost. Portfolio views surface systemic drivers, while alerts flag outliers (missed interviews, excess OAs, low-allowance examiners) before spend spirals. Export a defensible brief and lock the playbook so teams and outside counsel make the same, data-backed calls.
See Cost Before You Spend
Identify inefficiencies, spot cost-saving opportunities, and allocate resources more effectively across your portfolio.
Forecast prosecution outcomes and reduce uncertainty in filing, appeals, and global strategy.
Identify examiners who respond to interviews, and those who don’t. In our research, most examiners are more likely to allow when interviews are used.
Analyze with confidence using Juristat Analytics’ industry-leading database, drawn from 10M+ pending, abandoned, and granted applications.
Trigger notifications when OA counts exceed examiner norms, interview windows are missed, or low-allowance risk crosses your line—so teams intervene early.
Convert benchmarks into rules. Alert when matters exceed OA thresholds, skip interviews where they work, or stall with low-allowance examiners.
"I appreciate Juristat's customer service. The chat feature is always touted, and I can certainly see why."
“Using Juristat Analytics in our decision-making process helps us obtain the most valuable claim scope for our clients in the most efficient way.”
“There’s a lot of competition, lots of price pressure, and having these patent metrics can help us save our clients time and cost during the prosecution process.”
Be more than just a patent attorney to your clients. Become a valuable business partner.
Use Juristat Analytics to budget smarter and reduce actions
Examiner allowance rate, average OAs to allowance, pendency, and post-action outcomes (interview, RCE, appeal), plus program impacts like Track One.
Yes. Forecast downstream cost and odds of success to justify pruning or continuing a family.
Our research shows interviews can increase allowance rates by up to nine percentage points, depending on examiner. Build that impact into your forecast.
Alerts flag patterns like excessive OAs, missed interviews, and low-allowance examiners so you intervene before costs compound.
No. Juristat Analytics complements your system of record with analytics, forecasting, and portfolio alerts.
The right analytics can help in-house teams save money and firms optimize their budgets. See how to use Juristat to determine which superfluous applications and actions result in unnecessary spending and keep the ongoing cost of issued patents low.
