Prosecution Strategy

Build A Prosecution Strategy That Wins

Choose the best path to allowance with examiner data, a purpose-built dashboard, and appeals intelligence

Prosecution Strategy

Build A Prosecution Strategy That Wins

Choose the best path to allowance with examiner data, a purpose-built dashboard, and appeals intelligence

Know your odds. Invest with intent.

Make the right call faster

Every office action is a fork in the road. Interview, RCE, appeal, or abandon. Track One or standard. Push now or pivot. Without data, these calls get expensive fast.

Juristat makes the next move clear with examiner-level win rates, portfolio alerts, and a ready-to-use Prosecution Strategy dashboard. Evaluate Track One and other USPTO programs before you spend. And bring evidence to every escalation with the Appeals Module. Standardize decisions across attorneys and outside counsel so you cut actions, time, and money—not corners.

From dashboard to decision in one workflow

Juristat turns a shifting prosecution landscape into a clear, data-backed playbook. Live signals surface where to act—interview, appeal, and continuation opportunities, long prosecutions, and low-allowance examiners—anchored in examiner, art-unit, and tech-center context from a 10M+ application dataset.

When an appeal is in play, the Appeals Module benchmarks reversal patterns across similar cases; forward-citation momentum shows where to protect, license, or prune. Rules and alerts enforce when to push, pivot, or walk away, and exportable briefs align counsel and leadership the same day—so you choose the lowest-cost, highest-confidence path, consistently.

Try the Platform

Turn Decisions Into Predictable Wins

Standardize your playbook across examiners, firms, and business units

See what worked for others

Surface arguments, outcomes, and strategies from similar appeals. Learn from historical data to strengthen your prosecution or appeal approach.

Find your next best move

Get data-backed recommendations for when to appeal, request a pre-brief conference, or pursue amendments/RCEs.

Data-backed filing decisions

Forecast prosecution outcomes and reduce uncertainty in filing, appeals, and global strategy.

Defend innovation with confidence

Leverage analytics-driven prosecution to ensure stronger, more defensible patents.

Predict examiner behavior

Anticipate examiner trends to craft strategies with precision and confidence.

Accelerate prosecution

Reduce costly detours and move more patents to allowance with fewer office actions.

Trusted by the World's Most Innovative Teams

“Three new applications cover the cost of Juristat. I have received more than that since using Juristat."

Kari Footland

Patent Attorney

“Using Juristat Analytics in our decision-making process helps us obtain the most valuable claim scope for our clients in the most efficient way.”

Gavin J. O’Keefe

Partner at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

“Using the drafting tool, I’ve been successful in steering claims away from undesirable tech centers, art units, and classes with high 101 rejection rates or low allowance rates.”

Michael S. Borella, Ph.D.

Partner, Co-Chair Software & Business Methods Practice Group at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Build the workflow, not just the insight

Dashboards, alerts, and automations that turn IP data into action.

Frequently asked questions

Use data to choose the fastest path to allowance

What data does Juristat use?

Juristat’s industry-leading patent analytics database is based on more than 10 million applications. We examine USPTO data across pending, abandoned, and granted applications. Examiner, art unit, assignee, and firm metrics included. Historical coverage back to 2000.

How often is the data refreshed?

Automatically. Your dashboards and alerts stay current without manual imports.

Can I set custom alerts for risky prosecutions?

Yes. Trigger alerts on OA counts, RCE streaks, missed interviews, low-allowance examiners, and more—using thresholds you define.

Can our team standardize decisions across outside counsel?

Absolutely. Build if-then rules tied to examiner metrics, share them across matters, and enforce with alerts. Export the logic and results for alignment.

Can I evaluate programs like Track One inside Juristat?

Yes. Compare expected pendency and outcomes by tech area and examiner to decide when Track One (or other programs) makes sense.

Paying For Speed At The USPTO: Is Track One Worth It?

Track One promises faster prosecution – but is it still a smart investment? Watch a candid, data-driven breakdown of Track One ROI—when it accelerates strategy, and when it doesn’t.

Watch now

Stop wasting budget on guesswork

Patent prosecution is complex – we know. Take control of your IP strategy with Juristat.