(gradient).webp)
Choose the fastest, cheapest winning path across abandonments, interviews, appeals, and continuations
Choose the fastest, cheapest winning path across abandonments, interviews, appeals, and continuations
Every office action forces a choice. Interview, RCE, appeal, continuation, or walk away. Without hard data, those calls drag timelines and inflate costs.
Juristat Analytics turns prosecution choices into repeatable strategy. See examiner-level outcomes, model time and cost, and compare tactics before you spend. Standardize if-then rules, set alerts, and keep your team and outside counsel aligned on when to push, pivot, or prune.
Prosecution strategy starts with clarity. Juristat unifies allowance rates, actions to allowance, pendency, and tactic outcomes—framed by art-unit and tech-center context—so choices aren’t guided by averages or anecdotes.
From there, you model the real forks: Track One vs. standard, interview vs. RCE, appeal vs. amendment, continuation vs. strategic abandonment. See time, cost, and win-probability shifts to select the lowest-cost, highest-confidence path.
Appeals get the same rigor. The Appeals Module draws on two decades of outcomes to reveal reversal patterns across similar cases by examiner, firm, art unit, tech center, and assignee. Rules and alerts enforce your playbook across the docket, and exportable briefs align counsel and leadership fast.
Turn Decisions Into Predictable Wins
Surface arguments, outcomes, and strategies from similar appeals. Learn from historical data to strengthen your prosecution or appeal approach.
Access examiner-specific stats alongside broader insights at the firm, art unit, and tech center level. Compare reversal and affirmance rates across competitors and portfolios.
Get data-backed recommendations for when to appeal, request a pre-brief conference, or pursue amendments/RCEs.
Forecast prosecution outcomes and reduce uncertainty in filing, appeals, and global strategy.
Leverage analytics-driven prosecution to ensure stronger, more defensible patents.
Know when examiners cite your issued art in 102 rejections. Catch potential infringement, identify licensing prospects, and flag high-value families.
"I appreciate Juristat's customer service. The chat feature is always touted, and I can certainly see why."
“Three new applications cover the cost of Juristat. I have received more than that since using Juristat."
“Using Juristat Analytics in our decision-making process helps us obtain the most valuable claim scope for our clients in the most efficient way.”
Be more than just a patent attorney to your clients. Become a valuable business partner.
Use Juristat Analytics to choose the lowest-cost winning path
Examiner allowance rate, average OAs to allowance, pendency, and post-action outcomes by tactic, plus program impacts and portfolio context.
Yes. Create if-then rules and alerts tied to examiner metrics and OA counts, then share the playbook across matters.
Yes. To decide when to appeal, view reversal, reversal-in-part, and affirmance trends across examiners, art units, and tech centers.
Yes. Forecast downstream cost and odds of success to justify continuing a family or pruning it.
Export charts and tables or a one-page summary to support budgets and approvals.
Corporate IP teams are under pressure to control costs and improve outcomes. Outside counsel must show value and adapt to each client’s goals. However, without shared data and clear policies, collaboration often breaks down and results diminish. This webinar is your blueprint for saving up to 20% by creating actionable, measurable IP policies—together.
